We all love games and we all love movies, but how many good movies can you remember based on a video game??
Whose fault is it that every video game adaptation ends in failure??
Who is Uwe Boll and why is he in the ring against film critics??
You will learn this and much more in today’s episode of Game Theories!
Best comments
I really like Lara Croft. Especially Jolie in her role. And it’s strange, but I liked the movie “Need for Speed: Need for Speed” :)))) And I like the first part of “Silent Hill”, I also like “Prince of Persia”
And, naturally, I thought that Uwe would be shoved here. But, I still liked one movie, and that’s the first part, and that’s not because of the games 🙂
Fortunately, cinema will remain cinema, and video games will remain video games. Because it would be complete bullshit if you put it all together Thanks for the translation.
I’m waiting for the Deadpool movie. The authors refuted the 13+ rating and said that the entire film is consistently 18+, and also said that Deadpool will remain the same as in comics and games. So we are waiting for the completely absent 4th wall and a sea of trash and humor.
Everything is much simpler. Games based on films are made primarily not for players, but for the masses. Partly – to make money, but on the other hand – to promote the culture of games to the masses. For this we already need to say thank you. People are trying for you, the players.
Also, it all depends https://bubblebonusbingocasino.co.uk/ on the prism of perception. Take, for example, the new Hitman, which is about to be released. If we consider it from the player’s point of view, the film promises to be not very good, for the simple reason that it does not follow all the canons. However, if you look at it from the perspective of a person who has not played Hitman, then a stylish, suitable action game is emerging. You don’t need more. Well, judge for yourself, who would be interested in watching for 2 hours how the GG crawls on all fours the entire film, without killing anyone, but only in the end throwing the main villain down the stairs, supposedly an accident? Nobody, not even the players. Yes, you can talk for a long time about how it was possible to make a juicy psychological thriller and the like, but this is a slightly different steppe.
Moreover, screenwriters and directors are creative people. We (creatives, all of us) have our own prism of perception, our own vision of the creativity of other people. We perceive everything differently. And each of us would like to add a little flair to this or that work. This is fine. And we should also not forget that any movie based on games is only a motivation. A kind of fanfic. No more and no less. Someone might say, “Well, they could have made a movie about a hired killer without using the image of Hitman, but otherwise they just want to punish us, the fans who download the film from a torrent and watch it on their defective 21-inch monitor with crap calibration and defective sound from a Chinese mono speaker, dough.”. This is wrong. If you release a movie with a hero similar Hitman will be accused of plagiarism. And this is a much more serious accusation in Hollywood parties than the screeching of snotty fans “HITS NO CAKE!». Let me remind you, this is just fan fiction.
Returning to the prism of perception. If you don’t expect a motivational artist to follow all the canons, but only a good movie, then most films are a miracle! – you might like it. I’m not talking about all the films, but only about some of the films that were undeservedly persecuted. It’s not the crew’s fault, it’s the viewer’s fault. Besides, Uwe Boll isn’t that bad. He made a bunch of really good films not based on games and perfectly adapted Postal. So stop being like the herd, whining about the fact that there are no good films based on games, use your brain, watch it, and decide for yourself.
I can’t understand what he wants… A sort of movie remake of the game? The first Silent Hill, for example, was not bad as a film. The cinema and gaming industry are different things, they need different things to succeed, they have different views on timing. Prince of Persia is just terrible? Larra Croft is just terrible? Not at all, not the best films, but they are good action films. Tomatoes are the worst indicator you could take. 100% to the third season of Arrow, guys. No, he, of course, said that the critics there were biased, but wasn’t it worth it not to take this site then??
P.S. The first RE is an excellent thriller.
I didn’t really understand the idea that the author proposes at the end. He’s talking about creating games based on films, or he was talking about technology that would give films interactivity? Or about everything at once? But it’s hard for me to imagine how it would be possible to influence the plot of the film. It’s okay if you’re sitting at home and just choosing plot options. And at the cinema? Not by voting.
The author means at least some action and influence on the viewer on the part of the character.
P.S: On Twitch, they used the voting method to play old Pokemon and nothing, they went well.
I really want to believe, but unfortunately almost none of the publishers/developers/studios/here insert the names of all companies in the world, I can’t believe it 🙁
Educational video. I once heard that Uwe Boll launders money through his films, but here they explained in detail how he did it.
But at one point it is not clear why the author equates films made for a mass audience (i.e.e. where the bulk of the box office will be formed by ordinary viewers) with films that are aimed specifically at game fans. As an example, we can take FF7: Advent Children, it is clear that among critics it will have an extremely low rating (33% on the same Rotten Tomatoes), although the goal is to satisfy the fan base (which it does successfully).